|
GyneFix® |
Background : Uterine Cavities Differ |
![]() |
Studies of the uterus have shown that it is not easy to design a universal IUD. Indeed uterine cavities differ considerably in all women. The uterus is also subject to changes in size and volume during the menstrual cycle. These changes are most pronounced at the time of the menstrual period. It is therefore unreasonable to expect one standard sized intrauterine device (IUD) to fit uterine cavities of every different sizes and volume. IUDs that are much bigger, or much smaller than the uterine cavity can cause problems. If the width of the uterine cavity is too small, side effects and complications are likely to occur. The crossarms of standard T-shaped IUDs are frequently too long for a large number of uterine cavities, as the average width of most uterine cavities is often smaller than the width of the IUD itself. When the uterine cavity is much longer than the IUD, the device becomes partly or completely lodged in the lower uterine isthmic segment, triggering uterine activity that may promote explusion and give rise to pain.
Prof. Howard Tatum, inventor of the standard T-shaped IUD:
“The most important factor in reducing IUD side effects is the elimination
of distortion of the uterine cavity”
|
To reduce side effects and maximise tolerance, women should be fitted with an IUD which causes no or minimal distortion of the uterine cavity. The realtionship between the IUD and the uterine cavity is optimal with the frameless GyneFix® IUD.
Minimizing the size of the intrauterine foreign body
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
GyneFix®
standard |
GyneFix® standard compared with TCu380A (Gravigard®) and Multiload® (ML) Cu375 IUD. |
|
||
|
Three generations of IUDs: GyneFix® mini is the smallest IUD ever developed
|
|
|
|
1960s: The Lippes Loop, developed in the 1960s resulted directly from the invention of thermoplastics. |
|
1980s: The TCu380A or Paragard® seemed a logical design which would cause a minimum of distortion of the endometrial cavity. |
|
|
2003:
The total surface area of the GyneFix® mini is three times
lower than TCu380A and six times lower than the Lippes Loop. The anchored, frameless and flexible, GyneFix® mini IUD was developed to
improve performance and enhance acceptability of intrauterine
contraception. |
|
|
|
|
The following summary is based on large-scale, long term international multicenter randomised and non-randomised comparative studies in parous and nulliparous women covering over 20,000 woman-years of experience: |
|
HIGHLY
EFFECTIVE |
|
LOW
EXPULSION |
|
OPTIMAL
TOLERANCE |
|
Advantages
of the "frameless" copper-releasing IUS over conventional
"framed" copper IUDs (e.g. TCu380A, MLCu375)
|
|
Parous
as well as nulliparous women have been highly satisfied with the use of
GyneFix®. When properly inserted, the frameless IUD offers several important advantages:
|
|
Some
comments on abnormal bleeding and pain : the main reason for IUD removal |
|
BLEEDING |
|
PAIN |
|
GyneFix®
IN NULLIPAROUS WOMEN GyneFix® mini should be the preferred option in nulliparous women. |
|
GyneFix®
AS AN EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTIVE |
|
GyneFix® FOR IMMEDIATE POST-ABORTAL USE |
|
GyneFix®
AS AN ALTERNATIVE FOR STERILISATION |
|
journal |
title |
availability |
|
J Obstet Gynecol Research 2003;29:164-173 |
The "frameless" copper intrauterine system (IUS) for long-term, reversible contraception - a review of 15 years of clinical experience |
|
|
Gynécol Obstét Fertil 2001;29:549-564 |
L’implant contraceptif intra-uterin sans armature (GyneFix®) (nouvel inserteur mark 2) |
|
| Submitted | Three-year efficacy and acceptability of the GyneFix® 200 intrauterine system (IUS) | abstract |
| Submitted |
Menstrual blood loss with a miniature, “frameless”, copper-releasing intrauterine system |
abstract |